Taylor Swift Ad, Too Much Editing For UK

Taylor Swift Ad, Too Much Editing For UK

Taylor Swift's CoverGirl ad has been pulled by Procter & Gamble, it was cited by the United Kingdom for excessive Photoshopping. The National Advertising Division (NAD), the ad industry's self-regulatory body created to..

..review factual claims in national advertisements, issued a statement saying 'it has determined that Procter & Gamble Company acted properly in discontinuing superior performance claims made in print advertising by the company for..

..its CoverGirl NatureLuxe Mousse Mascara.' Specifically, the NAD asked P&G to verify claims that the mascara has two times more volume vs. bare lashes and is 20 percent lighter than the most expensive mascara.

The implied messages that consumers who use the productwould get lashes like those depicted in the advertisement & the lashes depicted in picture were achieved solely by using [mascara].. without post-production enhancement.'

Categories: Taylor Swift
Share this



15 comments:

Dec 20, 2011 @ 05:13 pm
simpleness said:

excessive Photoshopping.

Don't they know that Taylor is naturally flawless?

§urp
Dec 20, 2011 @ 05:25 pm
JJlover said:

Don't they know that Taylor is naturally flawless?
__

THIS Smile
Dec 20, 2011 @ 05:27 pm
Lantonia said:

V I C K Y !
Dec 20, 2011 @ 05:30 pm
Lantonia said:

Bleh, guess I was too late. :/
Dec 20, 2011 @ 05:41 pm
kattt. said:

I wish more people would start trying to stand up to photoshop. It's disgusting how much they do it to almost ALL celebrities, Taylor Swift included.
Dec 20, 2011 @ 05:52 pm
thisloveisours said:

why photoshop??
Dec 20, 2011 @ 05:54 pm
simpleness said:

Next time P&G should just smeear shit on their magazine covers. They should also have shit samples inside the magazines.

§urp
Dec 20, 2011 @ 06:06 pm
bromance said:

Seriously? The industry's been doing this for years and all of a sudden they need to make an example out of Taylor Swift's eyelashes? Oh, ok.
Dec 20, 2011 @ 06:20 pm
simpleness said:

Seriously? The industry's been doing this for years and all of a sudden they need to make an example out of Taylor Swift's eyelashes? Oh, ok
====
LOL.

§urp
Dec 20, 2011 @ 06:29 pm
BrokenArrow said:

Seriously? The industry's been doing this for years and all of a sudden they need to make an example out of Taylor Swift's eyelashes? Oh, ok

---

I was going to say the same lol
Dec 20, 2011 @ 06:36 pm
JJlover said:

V I C K Y !
__
LANI! u still here?
Dec 20, 2011 @ 08:15 pm
threelittlebirds said:

how stupid. every make up ad is photo shopped.
Dec 21, 2011 @ 02:24 am
TSwiftLessThanThree said:

http://nicholask14.tumblr.com/
(replying to this) - Dec 21, 2011 @ 01:47 pm
whindy said:

threelittlebirds said:
how stupid. every make up ad is photo shopped.
----------------------------------------------
agreed, in magazines as i flip through im just like "photo shopped, photo shopped, and DEFF PHOTO SHOPPED" its crazy
Dec 22, 2011 @ 08:52 am
Elysse said:

Why do they need to do this? I don't see anything wrong with Taylor's natural skin or lashes. No need to photoshop everything. That's false advertisement.

cheap suitcases