Harry Styles Wins Papparazi Ban Within 50 Meters Of Him & His Home

The world is not worthy of One Direction’s ray of sunshine in the midst of darkness and generous flawfree human being that has brought Christ and hope to the world, Harry Styles has won a court order banning the paparazzi from pursuing him in the street or waiting outside his house. The 19-year-old asked the high court to prevent photographers from following him after trying to persuade them to change their behaviour, according to his lawyer. The court orders photographers to stop pursuing singer, placing him under surveillance or loitering within 50 meters of his home. FULL STORY UNDER!

An order handed down by Mrs Justice Nicola Davies orders unnamed photographers to stop pursuing the singer by car or motorcycle, placing him under surveillance or loitering within 50 metres of his place of residence to monitor his movements. Styles was not in court for the short hearing on Monday. His lawyer David Sherborne told the court: “This is not a privacy injunction. Mr Styles is not trying to prevent fans approaching him in the street and taking photos. He remains happy to do that, as he always has. Rather, it is the method or tactics which have been used by a certain type of photographer.” Sherborne said the case concerned a series of paparazzi photographers, four of whom were in the process of being identified. Styles’s injunction will continue until another hearing in the week beginning 13 January, which will decide how the action should proceed.


  • anonymous

    this is the way it should be done :’)

  • Cici

    right on!

  • lucy

    Well GOOD! It’s about time these celebrities get some sort of privacy/protection

  • Duckyhoward15

    But didn’t he say he loves attention ? lol Harry one more thing

  • Tash

    It’s nice he got that. For years celebrities have been trying so hard just to feel protected more than anything. Because of how dangerous it was and was becoming. With tragic incidents like the death of princess Diana and recently the death of a member of the paparazzi affiliated with chasing a car of Biebers driven by a friend. So it’s dangerous on both ends. Also for public safety. But this is also unfair. So many celebrities have been petitioning for a law to be passed for years now and many individuals have visited thr high courts and put their case forward and received nothing. A big advocate for a change has been George Clooney who relentlessly pursued some sort of privacy and protection from the paparazzi, not only for himself but for all celebrities who wished it. I do understand that people may be more protected in the UK, such.as kids not being allowed to be photographed. But Princess Dianas death didn’t have them change laws in the UK or protect celebrities from that point on. Yet Harry Styles gets the privacy and protection. She was a bloody Princess! It’s just odd. Thats all. But anyway, this should be the same for all celebrities who wish it and the USA should stop being so fame greedy and put human lives above money and follow suit. It’s about the well being of all.

  • Tash

    I think Justin Bieber should get this. Not only is the paparazzi surrounding him hectic, but his team are actually a menace to the paparazzi. So the paparazzi need to be afraid. So the further away they are, the better for everyone. But I don’t know still. His team seem to be rough with a bunch of people actually. That’s a tough one. They can spot a camera from a million miles away and still be after you. So maybe King Biebs needs to make his own laws that he changes daily depending on his mood. Which he kinda does already so um….nevermind then.

More from around the web